Need new health insurance NOW?

If you experience certain life changes, you don’t have to wait for Open Enrollment in November to enroll in affordable health coverage on or your state’s marketplace. You have 60 days after the following events to apply for a Special Enrollment Period and enroll:

• Moving to a new zip code or county
• Getting married or divorced
• Having a baby, adopting or becoming a foster parent
• Becoming a U.S. citizen or getting a green card

You have 60 days before or after the following to enroll: 

• Losing your health insurance from your job
• Turning 26 and aging off your parent’s health plan

And if you are experiencing domestic violence and want to apply for your own health plan, you can do so at any time.

Learn more about Special Enrollment Periods at or call 1-800-318-2596.


Subscribe to our newsletter

Keep up with the latest actions and news!

Recent Articles
This area does not yet contain any content.
The journal that this archive was targeting has been deleted. Please update your configuration.
« Support the 3 GOP women standing against ACA repeal! | Main | Let’s declare our freedom from Trumpcare! »

Don’t be fooled! The new “improved” Senate bill is worse!

The Cruz amendment only makes this bill worse!

The Senate’s Republican leaders just released a new “improved” version of their Trumpcare bill, and it’s even worse than the previous version. This bill includes a controversial provision pushed by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) that amounts to the latest bad idea from Republicans trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Cruz says he wants to give consumers "choice,” by allowing insurers to sell cheaper skimpy plans that do not cover essential services like maternity care, prescription drugs and cancer screenings, as long as they also sell comprehensive plans. But the choice Cruz is offering is between insurance you don't want (the skimpy plans) and insurance you won’t be able to afford (the comprehensive plans, which will cost much more than they do now).

The same bad features from the previous version of Trumpcare still in the bill – including deep cuts to the Medicaid program, a provision preventing women on Medicaid from using Planned Parenthood and a ban on using federal premium subsidies to buy health plans that cover abortion.   Overall, the new bill is likely to lead to millions of people losing coverage, and leave millions more stuck with insurance that doesn’t cover what they need.  We’ll know more about exactly how the bill will hurt women, LGBTQ people and our families early next week, when the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) releases its analysis. But we know enough now to strongly oppose this bill.

We’ve stopped Trumpcare before and we must act again to show the Senate that they can’t get away with cutting health care for millions of people.  But we need to act quickly.  Senate leadership says that they’re going to vote on Trumpcare next week!

Our messages are simple: This bill can’t be fixed.  The bill cuts taxes for the rich and health care for the poor and middle class.  Don’t take health care away from people with pre-existing conditions.  Millions of people shouldn’t be pushed off or priced out of their coverage. 

Ready to get started?  The Senate switchboard number is 202-224-3121, or call toll free at 866-426-2631.  Want to find an event near you?   Try here and here.  Need a social media badge to show your opposition to the bill?  Check out RWV’s Facebook and Twitter channels and remember to use the hashtags #KillTheBill and #ProtectOurCare.

Want to know more about the latest Senate bill?

What else do we know about today’s version of the Senate bill?  It’s not all that different than the bill that passed the House in March, and the earlier version of the Senate bill.  It does away with the individual mandate, scales back eligibility for help paying premiums, pushes people who get premium assistance into plans that cover less, allows insurers to charge older folks five times as much as younger adults and ends the expansion of Medicaid.  People who are not able to maintain continuous coverage, possibly because they were laid off, or aged out of their parents’ plan, would be “locked out” for six months before they could buy their own insurance. 

The version of the bill introduced today does include a few provisions that are different than earlier versions of the bill.  But none of these changes make coverage better, and some even make things worse.  For example, because Medicaid cuts will devastate care for those struggling with addiction, an earlier version of the bill allocated $2 billion for states to address the national opioid crisis.  This version includes $45 billion, but addiction experts say that doesn’t even come close to meeting the need.  The Senate bill also allows people to use health savings accounts to pay for premiums, a benefit that mostly helps middle class and upper-income folks. 

The changes pushed by Ted Cruz, to allow insurers to sell stripped down plans, are very likely to make things worse for many of us, but especially women.  Here's why: The Cruz amendment would let insurance companies sell cheaper, skimpier health plans on that do not follow ACA rules, as long as they also offer a plan that does follow them. Under the ACA, all health plans must cover essential health benefits like maternity care, mental health care and prescription drugs. 

Young, healthy people will be inclined to save money by buying stripped down health plans with very limited coverage or just by skipping health insurance altogether. Meanwhile, anyone who has health problems that need treatment, including many people ages 50 to 64, will enroll in the more comprehensive ACA-compliant plans. The result will be the creation of two separate health insurance “risk pools” – one with young healthy people and a second one with sicker and older people. The expense of covering medical care for this second group of people will quickly drive up the cost of premiums for the ACA compliant plans to the point where the coverage will be unaffordable. This is what’s known as a “death spiral” in the health insurance world, meaning that eventually the health plan dies from lack of people able to pay the price of coverage.

So, one effect of the Cruz amendment would be to harm people with pre-existing conditions, making it difficult for them to find any affordable plan that covers the care they need. Some lower income people with pre-existing conditions (those who earn less than $42,000 a year) would be eligible for some financial assistance in paying premiums, under the Senate bill. But, the subsidies are tied to plans with $6,000 deductibles, so a low to moderate-income individual would be responsible for the first $6,000 in medical costs. Meanwhile, an estimated 1.5 million people with pre-existing conditions who earn more than $42,500 would get no financial help in paying the skyrocketing premiums for the comprehensive ACA-compliant plans. Even the insurance companies think the Cruz amendment is a bad idea! AHIP, an insurance industry trade group, says it would "de-stabilize the individual market and increase costs for those with pre-existing conditions."

But even the cheaper, skimpy coverage Cruz is promoting isn’t a solution – it’s part of the problem we tried to fix with the ACA.  Before 2010, insurers were allowed to sell skimpy plans on the individual market.  Only 12% of plans covered maternity care.  Skimpy plans had unrealistically low limits on annual coverage, leading many people who faced big bills with no way to pay.  Personal bankruptcy has dropped by 50% since the ACA went into effect and skimpy plans were banned.  Too many women and their families experienced the false promises of skimpy health insurance.  RWV knows how important it is to have comprehensive coverage with strong consumer protections.  We’ll be showing up to #ProtectOurCare starting right now.  Join us!

Can we stop this bill? Yes!

As members of Congress returned to D.C. this week following the Fourth of July Congressional recess, it has become clear that our hard work is paying off! West Virginia’s moderate Republican Senator, Shelley Moore Capito, said in a recent interview that she would cast the deciding vote against Trumpcare, if it came down to it. “I only see it through the lens of a vulnerable population who needs help, who I care about very deeply,” Capito said. “So that gives me strength. If I have to be that one person, I will be it.”

West Virginia FREE (WV FREE), RWV’s Charleston based regional coordinator, was busy over the Fourth of July recess, working hard to keep up the pressure on Senator Capito. WV FREE took advantage of the time Capito was at home in West Virginia, working with their coalition partners to rally for Capito’s support at a local Fourth of July parade. They also worked with their allies to put up lawn signs in Senator Capito's neighborhood that read “Protect Our Care, Save Our Jobs, #SaveMeCapito.”

WV FREE conducted a phone canvass to highlight the devastating impact Trumpcare would have on 180,000 West Virginians, and to encourage Capito to take a strong stance against it. Canvassers made phone calls to West Virginians in areas with the highest Medicaid enrollment rates, and offered to patch them through to Senator Capito’s office.

Another GOP Senator, Susan Collins of Maine, tweeted this afternoon that she still is a “no” vote on the Senate bill, even with the revisions unveiled today. RWV regional coordinator Maine Consumers for Health Care has been pressing her hard.

In a sign of just how tough it is going to be for ACA opponents to gather 50 votes for a bill to repeal and replace the ACA, two Republicans broke away from their party’s leadership and introduced their own plan, just moments before Majority Leader Mitch McConnell started briefing Senators on the details of his plan.  In an interview on CNN, Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said that they have devised an as yet-unnamed plan that would retain most of the taxes included in the ACA, and send the money to the states in block grants.  States would be free to provide coverage as they see fit, with limited oversight from the federal government.  Although the Senators implied that their plan would continue the financial assistance for consumers that has made coverage gains possible under the ACA, they also acknowledged that this funding could be cut, perhaps within months, if the Republicans pass legislation cutting taxes.

The release of an alternative ACA repeal bill was unexpected, to say the least!  We don’t know whether or when the Cassidy/Graham repeal bill might be considered by the Senate.  But the willingness of two Senators to propose their own alternative bill means that getting to 50 votes for any repeal bill will be even more complicated.  Let’s keep the pressure on!


Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>